Preliminary statement of Specialty Crops Research Proposal Objectives

parwindergrewal's picture

 

Establishing vibrant specialty crops enterprises for building self-reliant and resilient cities
 
Parwinder Grewal, Project Director, Ohio State University, Wooster, Ohio
 
Cities are considered the engines of wealth and prosperity. Indeed, per capita income has been shown to be positively correlated with the proportion of population living in urbanized areas. More people now live in cities than rural areas and all future population growth is expected to occur in cities. Although cities occupy only 2% of the Earth’s land surface they consume75% of total global energy and produce 80% of all greenhouse gas emissions. Daily needs of modern cities for food, water, energy, and other materials are met almost exclusively through importation of goods from distant places, often across continents, contributing significantly to the ecological footprint of cities. Human population has doubled over the past 40 years which has resulted in increased destruction of earth’s natural resources. Increasing energy costs and climate change require a shift from globalization to relocalization of the economy with greater attention to preserving and enhancing natural capital. The challenge intensifies with emerging urban issues including increased inventory of vacant lots and decreased tax revenues due to home foreclosure crisis and urban sprawl, increased urban poverty, hunger, obesity, and heart-related ailments, and increased air, water, and soil contamination. Therefore, urban communities must focus on how to use and manage land, water, and built infrastructure to meet food, water, energy, and material needs locally, while addressing social, economic, and health issues without compromising the needs of future generations. 
 
We propose that local self-reliance or “capacity for self-sufficiency” can serve as an umbrella ecological principle to guide future development and transformation of cities and to address the critical and interconnected local and global issues. Under this principle, the goal of a city would be to use a holistic (ecosystem) approach to generate needed resources locally in a sustainable manner. This means that a self-reliant city will use its available natural resources and built infrastructure to fulfill most of its basic needs today and in the future. Thus, the nutrient cycles of the self-reliant city will be closed and its primary production will equal its respiration, maximizing resource use efficiency and recycling of waste. Local self-reliance as an organizing principle will strengthen urban-rural linkages with flow of goods and services in both directions. Overall, this paradigm shift will enhance city and regional resilience, minimize ecological footprint of growing human population, and improve local and global stability and economic sustainability.   
 

The need for local fresh food production has escalated during the past few years. Increases in home foreclosures, unemployment and inner city poverty are leading to hunger and malnutrition in US urban neighborhoods at an unprecedented scale. Children from poverty stricken areas are at most risk as food banks have emptied, food prices have risen, and access to fresh food is almost nonexistent in many inner city neighborhoods. The 2008 Federal Report on Food Security issued by the USDA in November 2009 indicates that 50 million people (14.6% of the US households) were food insecure in 2008. The report further shows that 17 million US children (one in every four children) lived in households in which food was scare at times and 1.1 million children were outright hungry, illustrating the vulnerability (as opposed to resilience) of urban ecosystems. Urban agriculture can play a huge role in enhancing self-reliance, restoring resilience and revitalizing affected neighborhoods by generating new employment opportunities in the production, processing, and distribution of fresh and processed fruits and vegetables as well as nursery and ornamental plants.  The increased availability of local produce will help mitigate hunger and malnutrition, while non-food plants can provide many practical and aesthetic purposes that enhance the quality of life in urban areas. Urban land banks have expanded during the past few years and cities are exploring ways to utilize land vacancies productively. We propose a trans-disciplinary, inter-institutional, and multi-state Coordinated Agricultural Project (CAP) to facilitate and enhance the production, processing, marketing, and utilization of specialty crops (fresh vegetables and fruits) in urban areas. Our long-term goal is to address the needs, characteristics, and potential of vibrant urban specialty crops enterprises and demonstrate their benefits to revitalization of poverty stricken neighborhoods. 

 

We plan to specifically focus on three P’s (People, Planet, and Profit). We propose to use an “inverted” Customer to Producer model (i.e. people first) as opposed to the typical Producer to Customer model. We will address production of specialty crops in urban areas at all scales from home and community gardens to full-fledged commercial operations, including those in seed and seedling delivery, designer soils and composting. In addition to the standard business models for commercial production, processing, and distribution, we plan to also explore community-based (distributed) business models including homeowner and community gardener cooperatives. We will also explore feasibility and benefits of producing and consuming specialty crops in schools, hospitals, nursing homes, public institutions, and private businesses. One of our goals would be to provide urban dwellers high quality, year-round, locally produced vegetables through efficient sustainable plant production systems supported with existing urban infrastructure.  By integrating commercial and non-profit production operations, it is desirable to achieve a broad based, community centered gardening network for seasonal production and commercial farms/greenhouses year-round production to meet urban food needs.

 

Proposed examples of specific objectives (please add using the attached model):   

1.     What zoning and tax abatements are most effective in creating space and facilitating urban protected environment production of specialty crops (e.g. greenhouses, high tunnels, vacant building reuse)?

2.     What educational programs are most effective in training home gardeners, community gardeners, school gardeners (K-12), and commercial producers in producing high quality and safe specialty crops?

3.     What processes and procedures are most effective for building urban soils for the production of high quality and safe specialty crops in urban areas?

4.     What are the most effective models to process and/or distribute food produced in home, community, school, and institutional gardens and in urban commercial farms?

5.     What are the most effective ways to increase consumption of locally-produced specialty crops (diet change, habits, attitudes and behavior change, etc.)? 

6.     Develop systems to increase yield and food availability using low-cost season extension plant production systems. We will meet plant production heating needs with energy harvested from waste heat or solar sources. We will develop approaches to recover energy and water from urban waste streams, and renewable resources for heating and irrigation needs of hobby gardening and commercial farming. The resource recovery effort will address two different production needs:

(i)              Season extension for low investment operations such as non-profit gardens including community, school, and workplace gardens. The targeted heating energy recovery are: 1) residual heat of gray water, and 2) solar heat.

(ii)            Year-round commercial operations that are much more energy intense than gardening operations. Potential waste heat could come from neighborhood factory, bakery, Laundromat K etc. It is also of interest to evaluate the feasibility of using greenhouses to harvest energy to meet heating needs of the plant production.

 

Please develop/write additional objectives/sub-objectives using the attached conceptual diagram. Also let us know if additional connections, etc need to be drawn/mapped on the diagram.        

 

One or more potential projects in each of the following cities (add more?):

 

Akron, Ohio

Cleveland, Ohio

Columbus, Ohio

Dayton, Ohio

Toledo, Ohio

Wooster, Ohio

Youngstown, Ohio
Chicago, Illinois

Flint, Michigan

Detroit, Michigan

Minneapolis, Minnesota 

Ashbury Park, New Jersey

Buffalo, New York

Philadelphia, Pennsylvania

Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania

Milwaukee, Wisconsin

 

 

Groups audience: 

Group content visibility: 

Use group defaults

Attachments: 

 

Comments

Parwinder, This fits with so

Brian Raison's picture

Parwinder,

This fits with so many interrelated programs around local foods. Fabulous. The 6 questions/objectives are particularly relevant.

On #2, you might add "4-H youth" to the list.

On #5, you might add part b.) What triggers a change in human behavior to purchase locally grown foods? (price, knowledge, health or environmental benefits, etc.)

I'm certainly available for the Dayton (greater Montgomery / Miami county area). This is a Very exciting proposal! Let us know how we can help!

Steve Bosserman was

webadmin's picture

Steve Bosserman was discussing this proposal with us on the Open Kollab (see http://openkollab.com) email list

My name is Sam Rose. I work with Forward Foundation, and we collaborate with the Open Kollab project

 

If you take a look at this page:

http://forwardfound.org/

On the front page there is a diagram there, titled "21st Century Wealth Generating Ecologies".  Wealth Generating Ecologies is a term that I coined to describe systems that are flexible and adaptable enough to be quickly adopted and used on the scale of the individual, yet are also inherently designed for sharing and transparency. This makes these systems able to address a majority of systems.  WGE address basic needs for food/energy, production of technology, cultural and education production, and access to what people need for basic survival.

This is the core operating model for what we could bring to any table as Forward Foundation.

What Forward Foundation would propose to build on or enhance these research objectives:

1. Activity based perspective and analysis: Instead of looking at the roles people appear to have, or that others think people should have, we look at the actions they are doing now. In every case where people are observed, and their activities are analyzed, the data, the analysis, and the tools to analyze are made publicly available, and organizations are sought who will commit to maintaining it as a resource. This activity research is also stored in a re-usable archived way, that allows for the data to be easily analyzed in complex systems, network systems, and other models (all of that analysis is also released). THE RESULT: You will have a system that will show you the emerging economic and systems-based opportunities on whatever scale you desire to look at. You'll also have a complex systems based way of looking at many, many dynamics in the system. Forward Foundation can commit to doing this. We've just written some proposals to do exactly this work.

2. A dedicated set of programs for specifically supporting literacies of cooperation and collaboration, and participatory media literacies. OK and Forward Foundation could both work together easily on this. The education is released under an open license, and is built in context with people who are solving problems. This means that when grant runs out, the *need* for *ongoing* education will need to be connected with stakeholders in the community.

3. 1 and 2 above integrated with a system for mentoring business and venture ideas, and connecting them to *multiple* different types of funding mechanisms. OK and Forward Found could both work on it

4. A system for creating physical and digital community currencies, not just for transacting, but also for tracking "cradle to cradle" flow of resources through systems, appropriate education at 2 when needed Forward Found is capable here. This could also include a means for transaction, which is something people in all of these communities are already asking for now.

5. Co-creating with communities a context-appropriate distributed manufacturing network. Forward Foundation is mapping this out with stakeholders now in Michigan, and it includes those doing food and energy production.

6. Giving access to co-creation of knowledge bases, and stewardship of those knowledge bases. The knowledge bases are developed with the people doing the learning. All learning generates contribution to knowledge bases as people learn.  This content is stored in a way that makes it highly re-usable, and support is given to make it re-usable in many contexts.

Thanks for your consideration

Let's add Athens, Ohio to the

AppStaple's picture

Let's add Athens, Ohio to the list of cities to demonstrate how key issues express in a small city, in the Appalachian region, and the kind of resources/assets a place like Athens can bring to the work.

To give an overview, I'd like to describe Athens as a food center: Looking at Athens as a hub, we have one of the best farmers markets in the country, the fastest growing solar/wind business (Third Sun), decade plus community gardens (Community Food Initiatives), the site of the only staple foods prototype in Ohio and perhaps the nation (Appalachian Staple Foods Collaborative/Shagbark Seed & Mill Co), a nationally known food business incubator/kitchen (ACEnet), a dozen restaraunts buying local, a university that buys local, and an active food policy council. The spokes of the hub include season round organic farms (Green Edge and Shade River), a fresh milk dairy (Snowville Creamery), a growing produce auction (Chesterhill Produce Auction), )a vibrant permaculture community, more community gardens and farmers markets located mulit generational communities living in rural food deserts facing food insecurity, diabetes and obestity.

Brandon and I (Appalachian Staple Foods Collaborative and Food Policy Council) met with leaders from food and farm based non profits (ACEnet, Rural Action, and Community Food Initiatives) on Thursday to discuss collaboration in general. We all agreed on an interest in working on this grant and would like to discuss the details if you agree that Athens is a good fit. I could see the Policy Council taking up research on tax abatements and zoning (we are already rewriting legislation for urban gardening, which is about to pass Council). The other orgs (ACEnet, Rural Action, Community Food Initiatives), can provide expertise as well.

I meet with the County Commissioners and City Officials soon (Commissioners Tuesday afteroon) and am ready to propose they offer match to this effort. Waht comes to mind is acreges: The County owns a farm that is 2-3 miles from city limits and a small park that is closer. We are intersted in identifying a portion of the farm for a permaculture design recreation trail among perenial foods (nut trees and shrubs). It's the location of the County's Job & Family Services complex (in teh former county home) and is 1/4 mile from the county's poorest town and its elementary school.

The park is in a densly populated unincorporated community on a state highway, just two miles from Athens.

The city also has land as does the university (I meet with the Unversity Sustainability Coordinator next Wednesday). I imagine the city would want to offer land match, but I ownder if the decsion making processes of OU would be able to meet the deadline for this project.

So, do you all see a fit with Athens? Can we flesh out how that might play out this week?

Michelle